It’s the quintessential Starbucks experience: Walk in, order a piping hot cup of coffee and sit back with a newspaper.
Or, at least, that’s how it used to be in an earlier era. Now, starting in September, you won’t be able to buy any newspapers at the coffee giant’s shops.
The company said this week that it would stop carrying print editions of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and local newspapers at its 8,600 locations across the country.
Starbucks did not give a reason for the change, but said it would also remove shelving fixtures that display whole-bean coffee and grab-and-go snacks.
“We are always looking at what we offer our customers in our stores and making adjustments to our portfolio based on changing customer behavior,” Sanja Gould, a company spokeswoman, said in a statement Friday.
Starbucks expects the changes to be completed by the end of September.
Jordan Cohen, a spokesman for The Times, said in a statement, “Although disappointed by the decision, we’re confident that given our wide retail distribution, readers will have no trouble finding The New York Times for sale at nearby outlets.”
The Journal was discussing other ways Starbucks customers could gain access to the publication, said Colleen Schwartz, a spokeswoman for Dow Jones, a sister company of The Journal.
It was unclear if sales had anything to do with Starbucks’s decision.
Print circulation has declined across the country, according to data published in July by the Pew Research Center.
The organization estimated that in 2018, total daily newspaper circulation in the United States, which includes both digital and print platforms, was 28.6 million for weekdays and 30.8 million for Sundays. Those figures were down 8 percent and 9 percent from the previous year.
The Times’s average print circulation in 2018 was about 487,000 on weekdays and 992,000 on Sundays, Mr. Cohen said. The Journal’s average circulation is just over one million, Ms. Schwartz said.
Coffee and macchiato drinkers at Starbucks shops in Manhattan had mixed reactions to the news.
“I think it should still be available,” Dustin Fitzharris said on Friday while sitting at the 15th Street and Seventh Avenue location. He suggested that perhaps some Starbucks customers want their news the old-fashioned way.
“Not everybody is on their computers,” Mr. Fitzharris said. “Especially for a certain age demographic. An older demographic may not come in with their iPad or their computer. They will come in with a book or want to read the paper.”
At the same location, David Perozzi said Starbucks made a good decision.
“I think it makes total sense; it’s not a surprise,” he said. “I don’t think there is any upside to keeping the paper. If you look around in this Starbucks, there’s no one buying a newspaper. It’s just another casualty of change. Another casualty of the internet.”
At least two customers said they had never seen newspapers at Starbucks.
“I’m in Starbucks every day in New Jersey and New York and I don’t feel like I see a lot of newspapers on display,” said Lisa Kelly, who was waiting for someone at the Eighth Avenue and 39th Street location.
She said that she usually goes to Starbucks once a day, sometimes twice, and that she would be inclined to read a newspaper if one were around.
“I’ve never seen them selling them,” Jeff Grubb said at the same location. “Honestly, never. I’ve been to many Starbucks in my life. I think they should sell them. The Washington Post, The New York Times, they should be here.”
“I think it would be smart of Starbucks to offer things to read,” Mr. Grubb said. Starbucks, in his opinion, needs to up its “game” or it’ll be “extinguished soon.”
“They’re like McDonald’s now, it’s kind of a thing of the past,” he said.